肿瘤教育建立Twitter杂志俱乐部的可行性
背景:医学实习生越来越多地利用社交媒体平台进行职业发展、社交和教育。Twitter聊天(TC)是一种不断发展的工具，可以让卫生专业人员参与虚拟的多机构、跨学科的讨论。一项对Twitter作为住院医师教育工具的元分析显示，其满意度和概念保留率很高。尽管被迅速采纳，但很少有研究涉及研究生医学教育中社交媒体的使用和实施的需求。
方法:我们创建了一个Twitter帐户(@HOjournalclub)，并使用healthcare symplur注册了一个认证的hashtag (#HOJournalClub)。对于每个月的TC，选择一个特定的肿瘤类型和相关的出版物。这些信息经过传播和放大，在Twitter上传播给学员。每个技术委员会都邀请了一名内容专家提供补充评论。在TCs中，参与者回答基于关键期刊评估领域的问题。定性和定量分析。收集了基本的人口统计数据和跟踪标签的使用情况，以衡量印象、参与者和每个TC的推文。调查人员对调查结果进行了整理，并对总体主题进行了评估。参与者被调查了参与的难易程度，文章的可获得性，以及之前使用社交媒体进行教育的情况。
结果:自成立以来，@HOJournalClub已经发展到。650粉丝。大多数是在美国的(83%)医学培训生或医疗保健专业人员。其他关注者分布在南美、非洲、英国、欧洲、中东、印度、东亚和澳大利亚。性别分布均匀(51%男性，49%女性)。到目前为止，已经进行了5次HOJournalClub聊天。每项研究吸引了平均30名参与者，产生了平均217条推文。聊天在48小时内获得了27万的平均印象(22.1万- 31.9万)。大多数参与者实时访问聊天内容，只有一小部分人在交替的时间响应。这种非同步使用增强了国际参与。在tc后的调查中，大多数受访者报告是TCs的新使用者(48%)或散发性使用者(48%)。调查参与者报告称，TC参与增加了与该领域其他人的互动，提高了文献评估技能，并导致临床实践的变化。
结论:实施基于twitter的期刊俱乐部是可行的，并吸引学员的参与，促进参与和网络。它代表了一个新的教育工具，参与多机构，多国和跨学科的讨论相关血液学/肿瘤学文献。
Feasibility of developing a Twitter journal club for hematology/oncology education.
First Author: Elizabeth Henry, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
Background: Medical trainees are increasingly utilizing social media platforms for professional development, networking and education. Twitter chats (TC) are a growing tool to engage health professionals in virtual multi-institutional, crossdiscipline discussions. A meta-analysis of Twitter as a tool in residency education demonstrated high rates of satisfaction and concept retention. Despite rapid uptake, few studies address needs for social media use and implementation in graduate medical education.
Methods: We created a Twitter account (@HOjournalclub) and registered a certified hashtag (#HOJournalClub) with healthcare symplur. For each monthly TC, a specific tumor type and relevant publication was selected. This information was disseminated and amplified to reach trainees on Twitter. A content expert was invited to each TC to provide additional commentary. During TCs, participants answer questions based on domains of critical journal appraisal. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed. Basic demographics and tracked hashtag use to measure impressions, participants, and tweets per TC were gathered. Responses were collated and general themes were assessed. Participants were surveyed on ease of participation, article accessibility, and prior use of social media for education.
Results: Since inception, @HOJournalClub has grown to.650 followers. Most are US-based (83%) medical trainees or healthcare professionals. Additional followers are in South America, Africa, UK, Europe, Middle East, India, East Asia and Australia. Gender is evenly distributed (51% male, 49% female.) Five #HOJournalClub chats have been held to date. Each attracted a mean of 30 participants, generating a mean of 217 tweets. Chats garnered a mean of 270,000 impressions (221,000-319,000) in the 48h after TC. Most participants accessed the chat in real time, with a small subset responding at alternate times. This asynchronous use has enhanced international participation. In post-TC surveys, majority of respondents report being new (48%) or sporadic (48%) users of TCs. Survey participants reported TC participation increased interaction with others in the field, improved literature appraisal skills and led to changes in clinical practice.
Conclusions: Implementation of a Twitter-based journal club is feasible and attracts participation from trainees, promoting engagement and networking. It represents a novel educational tool for engagement in multi-institutional, multinational and cross-discipline discussion of relevant hematology/oncology literature.
