分享
  • 收藏
    X
    肺结节处理现状令人担忧
    474
    1

    Real-world snapshot of lung nodule management raises concerns

    芝加哥——南加州医科大学的Nichole Tanner医生在美国胸科医师协会(ACCP)年会上报告了一项纳入385例患者的回顾性分析结果:因可疑肺结节而被社区呼吸科医生实施手术的患者,每3例中就有1例并无癌症。而且,半数良性疾病患者接受了侵入性操作。


    Nichole Tanner医生

    医生的判断在新近更新的ACCP肺癌指南中占有重要地位(Chest 2013;143:e93S-e120S)。指南建议临床医生根据自己的临床判断进行定性和/或采用经过验证的风险模型进行定量,在检查前估计直径>8 mm的不确定结节的恶性概率。

    这项研究在全美16个地点进行,受试者有直径8~20 mm的结节,大多是既往(45%)或目前(27.5%)吸烟者、白人(86%),并有私人保险(55.3%)或Medicare保险(38.2%),平均年龄为64.5岁。

    侵入性操作包括除单纯影像学监测以外的任何操作。计算机断层扫描(CT)和纤支镜引导下穿刺活检被认为是微创侵入性操作,而明显有创性操作包括任何外科操作,如纵隔镜检查、胸廓切开和电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)。

    结果显示,仅有184例患者接受了监测,而且检查次数跨度很大,2年内从1次到“令人震惊的7次”CT或正电子发射断层扫描(PET)扫描不等。而这些结节没有1个是恶性的。

    在接受了活检的124个结节中,35%为恶性,56%被诊断为良性,8%根据稳定性被判断为良性。在77个手术切除的的结节中,64%为恶性,36%为良性。

    该研究结果令人欣慰的方面是社区呼吸医生遇到的肺结节76%是良性的,令人担忧的一面是随着肺癌筛查的广泛开展,对此类患者的处理方式趋于多样化。

    在报告结束后的例行讨论中,一些与会者表达了对“36%的患者因良性疾病接受手术”这一现状的担忧,并强调胸廓切开术伴随着3%的死亡率,而且手术后肺功能有可能下降。包括胸外科医生在内的其他与会者则反驳,切除可疑的结节可以在早期解决肺部疾病,从而不必再重复进行CT/PET成像,而且也顺应了一些患者的要求(以消除担忧甚至是为了通过入职前体检)。

    会议共同主持人、麦克吉尔大学的介入呼吸病学专家Anne Gonzalez医生在接受采访时表示:“我对于如此多的患者直接接受手术也感到震惊,但另一方面,指南确实推荐,如果怀疑肺癌的概率足够高——达到65%,患者就应当接受手术。”Gonzalez医生还呼应了与会者的讨论,指出这项研究没有详细记录患者的结节是偶然发现的还是因出现症状而接受筛查是发现的。

    在多变量分析中,吸烟(OR,3.28)和结节较大(12~15 mm:OR,3.30;16~20 mm:OR,4.97)对侵入性操作的对象选择有影响。研究者还发现地理位置不是预测因素。在16~20 mm的结节和12~15 mm的结节中,分别有39%和31%为癌症,而在8~11 mm的结节中仅有12%为癌症。

    一名与会者表示,他所在的医院建立了一个由45人组成的多学科肿瘤委员会以评估肺结节患者的处置,因良性疾病接受手术的患者数量随之大幅减少。Tanner医生在接受采访时表示,这种方法在患者不会失访的情况下是有帮助的,而且可获得多个科室的医生的支持,但“我不认为这种方法对所有肺结节都适用”。“在肺癌筛查程序方面,我们退伍军人事务部医院很快就将开始根据Fleischner肺结节影像学随访标准和ACCP指南作出诊断和治疗决策,以及ACCP指南。”

    Tanner医生报告称为Integrated诊断公司(该研究的资助方)提供了咨询服务。


    By: PATRICE WENDLING, Oncology Practice

    CHICAGO – One in three patients sent to surgery for a suspicious lung nodule by their community pulmonologist did not have cancer in a retrospective analysis of 385 patients.

    In addition, half of patients with benign disease underwent an invasive procedure, Dr. Nichole Tanner said at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP).

    In addition, half of patients with benign disease underwent an invasive procedure, Dr. Nichole Tanner said at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP).

    Physician judgment plays a key role in the newly updated ACCP lung cancer guidelines (Chest 2013;143:e93S-e120S). They recommend that clinicians estimate the pretest probability of malignancy for indeterminate nodules larger than 8 mm either qualitatively by using their clinical judgment and/or quantitatively with a validated risk model.

    Patients in the study, conducted at 16 sites across the country, had 8- to 20-mm nodules, and were mostly former (45%) or current smokers (27.5%), white (86%), and covered by private insurance (55.3%) or Medicare (38.2%). Their average age was 64.5 years.

    Invasive procedures included anything outside of simple imaging for monitoring. Computed tomography (CT)- and bronchoscopic-guided biopsy were considered minor invasive procedures, while major invasive procedures included any surgical procedure such as mediastinoscopy, thoracotomy, and video-assisted thorascopic surgery (VATS).

    Monitoring only was used for 184 patients, and ran the gamut from one to a "shocking seven" CT or positron-emission tomography (PET) scans in 2 years, said Dr. Tanner, with the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. None of these nodules were malignant.

    Of the 124 nodules biopsied, 35% were malignant, 56% were diagnosed as benign, and 8% were benign based on stability.

    Of the 77 nodules surgically removed, 64% were malignant and 36% were benign, she said.

    While a reassuring 76% of nodules seen by community pulmonologists were benign, the results highlight the complexity involved in managing a patient population that is surely on the rise as lung cancer screening spreads nationally.

    During a rousing debate that followed the presentation, audience members expressed concern over the 36% of patients taken to surgery for benign disease, highlighting a 3% death rate associated with thoracotomy and the potential for reduced lung function after surgery.

    Others, including a thoracic surgeon, countered that removal of a suspicious nodule can catch lung disease at an earlier stage, eliminates the need for repeat CT/PET imaging exposure, and is requested by some patients for their peace of mind or even to pass a pre-employment physical.

    Session comoderator and interventional respirologist Dr. Anne Gonzalez, with McGill University Health Center, Montreal, said in an interview, "I was perhaps shocked there were so many [patients] that went directly to surgery, but on the other hand, the guidelines do recommend that if the suspicion of lung cancer is high enough – 65% – patients should go to surgery."

    Dr. Gonzalez also echoed comments from the floor that, importantly, the study failed to detail whether patients’ nodules were identified as incidental findings or were the result of symptom-driven screening.

    In a multivariate analysis, current smoking (odds ratio, 3.28) and larger nodule size (12-15 mm: OR, 3.30; 16-20 mm: OR, 4.97) influenced who underwent invasive procedures, Dr. Tanner said. Geographic region of the country did not pan out as a predictor.

    Cancer was present in 39% of 16- to 20-mm nodules and 31% of 12- to 15-mm nodules, compared with 12% of 8- to 11-mm nodules.

    One attendee commented that the number of patients undergoing surgery for benign disease at his institution has dramatically declined with the establishment of a 45-member multidisciplinary tumor board to review and manage patients with lung nodules.

    This approach is helpful in that patients won’t be lost to follow-up and can be presented with a plan that has the support of multiple physicians, but "I don’t see this as a feasible way with which to manage every pulmonary nodule," Dr. Tanner said in an interview. "In the lung cancer screening program we’re implementing at our Veterans Affairs hospital in the very near future, we will have a nodule tracking system to ensure that no patients are lost to follow-up and will make treatment and diagnostic decisions based on the Fleischner criteria for radiographic follow-up of lung nodules, as well as the ACCP guidelines."

    Dr. Tanner reported consulting for the study sponsor, Integrated Diagnostics.

    2
    打赏
    收藏
    点击回复
        全部留言
    • 1
    • luca 管理员 2020-06-17 23:28 23:281楼

      癌症肺结节评价存在“过度或不足”
      2014-05-06

      肺结节较为常见,关于肺癌筛查实施的信息更多。在近期JAMA Internal Medicine报告的一项回顾性队列研究中,Wiener等发现癌症患者肺结节评估力度存在过高或过低的风险较高,后者包括具有潜在危害的不必要措施。
      本研究针对300例患者进行结节评估,最终在27例中检出癌症。评估过程包括1044项成像研究,147次会诊,76次活检,13次切除和21次住院治疗。过度评估的相关因素为放射医师推荐和CT扫描检测肺结节。评估不足的相关因素为放射医师推荐,接受一种以上的仪器检测,以及住院患者或术前访视中检测结节。
      这项研究涉及300名有“典型”不确定肺结节的成人患者(采用结节评估指南判断)。结节均为从2003年1月到2006年12月之间在15个退伍军人事务医院通过计算机断层扫描(CT)或放射性照相术检出。从结节检出时起即对病例记录进行详细的回顾,包括完成评估、癌症诊断直到2012年12月31日研究结束。主要结局指标为用于结节评估的资源,接受评估(参照Fleischner学会指南)的患者比例等。
      57例患者的结节直径≤4毫米,134例患者为5至8毫米,109例患者的结节直径大于8毫米。在所有患者中,平均年龄为66岁,94%为男性,86%是目前或曾经的吸烟者,54%为慢性阻塞性肺疾病,57%通过X线摄片检出结节, 13%为毛玻璃型,11%为毛刺型,36%位于上叶。
      有13%的患者出现提示肺癌的症状而进行初次成像检查,有42%的患者症状提示与结节无关,45%的患者无症状(例如,术前成像)。结节较大的患者采用放射成像术检测结节的可能性明显更大。
      总体而言,有27例患者(9%)最终被诊断为肺癌,其中1例(1.8%)结节≤4毫米,4例(3%)结节直径为5至8毫米,22例(20.2%)结节直径大于8毫米。结节较大的患者也更可能检出其他癌症。
      结节评估程序包括1044项成像研究,147次会诊,76例活检,13次切除,和21次住院治疗。良性结节患者接受结节评估测试的中位数为2次,肺癌患者为8次。X线监视(N = 277)持续时间中位数为13个月。
      微创手术46例;其中,19例没有检出癌症,8例发生并发症,包括7例气胸(5列住院),2例出血(1例住院),肺炎2例(均住院),死亡1例(死于肺炎)。46例活检患者中,中位活检次数为1次,但有9例患者在确诊前至少接受了3次活检。在13例接受手术切除的患者中,有4例为良性结节。19例患者因良性结节而接受微创手术的患者中,有4例出现并发症。15例患者接受无明确目的的评估。
      在2005年 Fleischner 学会指南发布后检出结节的197例患者中,有45%的患者接受的治疗不符合指南,包括18%得到过度评估,27%得到的评估不足。过度评估与基线结节大小负相关。放射医师推荐往往与指南一致,否则,他们更可能推荐更密集的评估。
      与二元分析相比,多变量分析包括多种与更多或更少的密集评估相关的多重因素,与指南不相符的评估相关的最强预测因子是来自放射医师的不恰当的推荐建议。与放射学检测相比,通过CT扫描检出结节与风险增加相关。
      研究人员得出结论:肺结节的评价往往与指南不符,包括延长监测或进行有潜在伤害的不必须的检测。在肺癌筛查广泛实施前应推行一系列的建议来改善评估质量,如对放射医师指南推荐进行修订和促进交流。
      信源地址:http://www.ascopost.com/ViewNews.aspx?nid=16135

    更多回复
    热门分类
    推荐内容
    扫一扫访问手机版